Journalists Against AIDS (JAAIDS) Nigeria

Situation Analysis Report on STD/HIV/AIDS in Nigeria

Federal Ministry of Health
National Action Committee on AIDS

Situation Analysis Report on STD/HIV/AIDS in Nigeria
March 2000

Acknowledgement

The present Situation Analysis for STD/HIV/AIDS is the result of the work of many individuals and teams working under the leadership of the Hon. Minister of Health, the chairmanship of Prof. G.C Onyemelukwe who led the Team setup by NASCP and the Chairmanship of NACA.

We would like to commend the political commitment of President Olusegun Obasanjo, who is constantly lobbying for actions to be undertaken in the field of STD/HIV/AIDS for Nigeria, and who isclosely following the preparation of the Strategic Plan that will bring an expanded national response to the fight against the epidemic in the country.

We would like to thank the Hon. Minister of Health for his determination in sharing the Strategic Plan vision with his collaborators, and particularly in making multisectorality a reality.The situation analysis is the picture of what is happening in all the various fields and sectors involved in the alleviation of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Nigeria, and not only in the health sector alone.

Our thanks also go to the Honorable Ministers of Information, Employment, Labor and Productivity, Culture and Tourism, Planning, Women and Youth, Education, Finance, Internal Affairs Agriculture and Sports, PLWHA, Governors of all the states, Commissioners of Health in all states, Chairmen of local governments, NGOs,
We would like to thank in particular the teams who have been working, sometimes under difficult situations, at States and local government levels to gather

The support at field levels are greatly appreciated, and our thanks go to all the persons whoaccepted to help, we unfortunately cannot enumerate all of them.

We also appreciate the contribution of DFID, WHO, UNICEF,USAID staff, who supported the various teams and also UNAIDS for their support of the revision of the situation analysis.
The situation analysis here presented will be widely distributed in order to obtain comments from all developmental partners at state, zonal, national and international levels. We therefore thank all those who will read this situation analysis

Prof. Ibironke Akinsete
NACA Chairman

 
Executive Summary

The situation analysis shows that STD/HIV/AIDS has unfortunately not been sufficiently addressed in the past decade.This is due to:

  • Unstable political situation in the country.
  • Lack of political will, commitment and involvement
  • Competing priorities in other areas.
  • lack of multisectoral approach as major interventions so far are in the area of healthcare delivery.
  • Centralization of the program, with little involvement of States and local governments.
  • Despite excellent intentions, programs are donor driven and often not sufficiently coordinated. Mostly “project oriented “ activities with little program approach Major donors had frozen their assistance for long periods of time
  • UN theme group had little impact during the period under review.
  • little recognition and lack of support for the work done by NGOs and CBOs
  • weaknesses in general planning and programming
  • absence of financial support for STD/HIV/AIDS activities in other sectors except for a minimal budget from the Ministry of Health
  • Weaknesses in management issues and management systems, including Information system management and poor data on the epidemic but also weaknesses in planning, programming, procurement, finance.
  • Insufficient nation wide awareness reflected by weak advocacy and information programs towards general populations and specific at risk groups: youth, women.
  • Persons living with AIDS were reluctant to actively participate in prevention and control activities.
  • The legal system has not been sufficiently adapted to the evolution of the situation, and the ethic committee on HIV/AIDS is not functional.

As a result of all these factors the situation analysis demonstrates that actions in the field of advocacy, information and awareness development have been scanty, and this has led the population to feel that STD/HIV/AIDS is not a major problem concerning them.In addition, AIDS is still regarded as a health problem and therefore is not sufficiently focused on behavioral change communication targeted at all Nigerians which would result in health seeking behaviors leading to early testing, and early treatment.

The available data, which is mostly based on sentinel surveys of adult pregnant women, shows that the sero prevalence rate for adult women is 5,4% as compared to 1.8% in 1992.

The situation analysis shows that:

  • There are indeed some weaknesses in the data as presented.It is mostly based on the sero prevalence of pregnant women. Infected women tend to have a lower chance of becoming pregnant, and therefore do not automatically frequent antenatal clinics where the surveys are taking place. Little data is available concerning youth, and pediatric HIV infection rate. Few other sero prevalence studies are available in other groups e.g. male adults with the exception of scanty data on the military and prisons.
  • Information concerning incidence rates is extremely scarce.  The voluntary screening centers are still very few in the country, and besides the private sector, which is widely developed in Nigeria, does not share its data with the Public sector.
  • The association of STDs with HIV has not been sufficiently addressed throughout the period, and STD control (early detection, and early treatment) has been neglected as an essential part of the response to fight HIV.(Data on STD is scanty).
  • A substantial amount of planning has been undertaken, but what often fails is that these plans have not been implemented in most cases.Examples are numerous: for years Nigeria has worked on Blood safety guidelines, including how to ensure a National Blood Transfusion service, how to screen the blood to be transfused for HIV, Syphilis, and Hepatitis B, but while plans exist for the past years they still have not been implemented. Other examples can be cited: guidelines are available in almost all fields, but they are often not distributed or else the training of staff to utilize them is not undertaken.

The situation analysis has identified these fundamental weaknesses: 

  • All linkages to health have been unsuccessful because there is a weak primary health care system. It shows that it has hindered even actions in the field of voluntary testing: Why tell a person that he is sero positive if the PHC back up cannot provide the essential support.
  • Past actions in the MTP l and ll have been project and action oriented instead of program oriented. The links between all these projects and actions were not evident.
  • Financial allocations have never been sufficient to support MTP I and MTP II
  • Past actions have lacked coordination – Most partners do what they want where they want, and this includes NGOS, CBOs and International organizations, the Private sector, etc. Past actions have lacked adequate monitoring and evaluation.Little is known about where one is starting from and of course it is difficult in such conditions to measure the results of any activities.
  • Much has been done, but with little impact as there have been insufficient efforts to share information, network and document information.
  • The medical field is far more advanced in reporting what is going on (although as mentioned above there are still lots of weaknesses) than the other sectors.  In particular the social, economic and cultural sectors are not sufficiently involved. There is lack of behavioral, cultural and economic impact studies. Information about youth, women, labor force, the informal sectors, children in and out of schools, women and men working in the informal sector, are lacking.
  • NGOs and CBOs work has not been sufficiently documented.This is one of the gaps that will have to be addressed.
  • States and local government are not sufficiently aware of what is going on in their territories in terms of STD/HIV/AIDS alleviation, and they are not sufficiently sensitized to the importance of undertaking multisectoral approaches to fight the epidemic.

Besides this long list of obstacles, many opportunities have been detected at multisectoral levels.The analysis of the response will demonstrate if these opportunities have been sufficiently taken into account. Some of these are:

  • The recent commitment at the highest level and shared vision by government leaders under the new expanded National response initiative.
  • The Government’s determination to support a Multisectoral approach
  • The Government’s determination to involve a new Multisectoral Presidential Committee on AIDS (PCA)
  • The Government’s determination to support a new Multisectoral committee on AIDS (NACA) and to make sure that they have the personnel, the space and the financial support to execute the program.
  • The Government’s efforts to establish a National response through the Strategic Plan.
  • The willingness of the Ministries and political bodies (Senate, House of Representatives) the organized Private sector, NGOs, PLWAs to join and collaborate with NACA.
  • Several reforms in the various sectors to make STD/HIV/AIDS a priority (Education, Health, Women and Youth, Sports, Labor, Finance, Planning, Defense, etc.)
  • Poverty alleviation programs
  • Beginning of Strategic Social Sectors Policies
  • Community response and involvement triggered by the work of NGOs and CBOs. And various peer group associations e.g. youth clubs,artists joining hands, media – net, Journalist against AIDS
  • Social marketing of condoms
  • Information services are reaching more and more communities, and they are adapting the information to their needs, including utilization of local languages (Increasing media response )
  • There is an increasing consciousness among International organizations including donors are becoming more and more conscious that an integrated approach and more coordination is necessary to help the Government, States and Local government develop their national response.

The exercise has demonstrated that Nigeria is now in a position to analyze its past programs with a real desire not to destroy what has been done so far, but to positively criticize it. This is in order to find solutions to the various problems that have been encountered and to utilize all opportunities that have been developed during the period under review.The realities have not been hidden, and that in itself is an immense step forward.

The situation analysis as conducted provides an excellent basis to map out what has been done so far and to spell out what were the difficulties and the opportunities in key sectors.It is essential to conduct the next step which is the analysis of the response which will show why it has not worked, or why it has worked in order to decide on what to prioritize in terms of efforts. What is working can be retained while strengthening what was not working so well, and also have the courage to drop all activities, which have hopelessly shown their failure to respond.

Introduction

Nigeria with a population of about 120Million people represents about 1/5 of the total African population. The result of the recently concluded November 1999 Sentinel Survey indicated that 5.4% of the adult population, which represents 50% of, total population are already infected with HIV. This means that 2.6 Million adults are living with the HIV (SOURCE, See Bibliography).

Nigerians in policy and academia in the early eighties denied the presence of HIV infection in Nigeria, which probably delayed the country from quickly, and appropriately reacting to the surging wave of the epidemic as was done in many other African countries. The first case of AIDS was reported in Nigeria 1986. Since then the trend has been on the increase as shown on fig 1-5.

The most severe impact has been on adults in their sexually active and economically reproductive years that is (15 – 45 years of age).

In certain areas like Enugu State, the mean HIV prevalence had increased from 2.3% in 1995 to 16.8% by 1999, an increase of more than 700%. Similarly eight other areas in the country had HIV prevalence rates greater than 10 percent.

The socio-economic impact of this epidemic on the Nigerian society has not been documented but it is becoming apparent that the already fragile health care delivery system is being overloaded. There are also more reported cases of monoparental families and orphans. Furthermore the Nigerian population continues to increase at an alarming rate of 2.83% or more. Hence, the projected impact will have disastrous consequence on the population of Nigeria and ultimately of Africa and the world. Despite all these, the Nigerian populace still continues to deny the existence of the disease.

HIV/AIDS/STD control program structures exist in the states and LGA but are confined to the Health sector alone. Although, many other partners have been involved (NGO, CBO, Religious organizations, Bilateral and multilateral organization), co-ordination of these efforts were weak and the program were very much donor driven and project oriented.

Objective of the Situation Analysis 

The overall objective of this situation analysis conducted in Nigeria was to understand the background factors that will help developmental partners, government (National, State and LGA and Communities) identify the most important areas for action to be developed in the strategic plan and budgeted plans of action. The specific objectives were as follows:

  • Identify who is vulnerable to STD/HIV/AIDS and why.
  • Identify the most serious obstacles that affected the implementation of STD/HIV/AIDS control and prevention activities in the country.
  • Identify the most promising opportunities for expanding the response of Nigeria to the epidemic.  

Scope 

The scope of the situation analysis was to have a total picture of what has been done so far in the whole country, which involved developmental partners in this exercise. It also involved obtaining data and documentation of STD/HIV/AIDS on-going activities over the period.Research 

Methods and Approaches

Methodology 
Nigeria has 36 states and FCT with 774 LGA and communication systems are difficult. Also because the budget to support the strategic plan formulation was limited, the following methodology was chosen: 

  • Advocacy meetings with Federal ministers, governors, commissioners, heads of hospitals, traditional / religious leaders and professionals associations. 
  • Focus group discussions with youths, NGO, CBO and the organized private sector.
  • Questionnaires (quantitative and qualitative) to the general public, sex workers, hoteliers, laboratory scientist, heads of hospital, religious, traditional leaders and traditional healers, and NGO.

The multisectoral and multidisciplinary committee which carried out the situation analysis under the direction of NASCP, were representative of the following institutions:

  • States ministries of health
  • Federal ministries (Health, education, labor, defense, information, youth, women, sports) planning commission, National population commission.
  • The academia: universities, research institutions, and tertiary hospitals.
  • DFID, UNICEF, WHO, USAIDS
  • Organized private sector.
  • PLWHA
  • NGOs, CBOs

The situation analysis was originally planned to commence in January 1988. However due to various problems including non-availability of funds, it did not start until January 2000. The exercise was conducted over a period of 8 weeks.  

Due to the short period for this exercise gaps have been identified and will be addressed in the strategic planning exercise and will be effected in the strategic planning activities.

Other limitations were insufficient time for training of all participants including members of the committee as well as poor utilization of guidelines. (UNAIDS Strategic Plan Guidelines)

Detailed Methodology

The various approaches included:

  • Formation of field teams.
  • Development and production of 15 sets of questionnaires for different target populations (Laboratory, Policy makers, Healthcare workers, General public, PLWHA, Traditional healers and Leaders, CSW, Hoteliers, Prisoners, NGOs, CBO SAPCs).
  • Training was minimally carried out for the field workers while the team leader carried out supervision. No pre-testing of the questionnaires were done as a result of the short time frame for the fieldwork.
  • Memoranda were invited from the general public through newspaper advertisement (New Nigeria and the Punch Newspapers); NTA and Federal Radio Coperation of Nigeria. Invitation letters were also delivered to The President of Nigeria Labor Congress and its 15 unions, including Health workers and NECA
  • One day visit per state
  • Random sampling of target population.
  • During the field visits data was collected through the following means: Direct administration of Questionnaires, Observation equipment, IEC materials, inferences drawn from Advocacy meetings with the Governors, community and Traditional Leaders; Moderation of FGD, in-depth interviews. Team members served as interviewers, reporters, moderators and key players in advocacy meetings. Where applicable tape recorders were used by the groups to record discussions.
  • Direct assessment of laboratory equipment, kit stock, equipment, personnel etc was also done to gather information. 
  • The Staff of the secretariat of the AIDS Control Program were also used to assist in the data gathering process in each of the states. Evaluation process in the states involved situation and response analysis, which include the structure at the state and local Government, secondary and tertiary institutions and other facilities.
  • Team group were created to undergo situation analysis – the states level and LGA (See annex for constitution of the team).

Data Entry and Analysis

Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained. A team composed of an Epidemiologist and a Computer Analyst was constituted to analyze data obtained from questionnaires and the focus group discussions. The data was managed using MS Access and MS Excel. The results of the analysis were disseminated amongst the members of the Central Evaluation team and modified in line with the comment of the teams. A report was produced in limited quantity for the perusal of the Minister of health. Further work is being done in order to present this result for wider distribution locally and internationally.

Analysis of the situation in key areas 
A decision was made to collect information in the following key areas: 

  • Safe sexual behavior
  • STD management
  • Blood safety
  • STD/HIV/AIDS prevention in young people
  • STD/HIV/AIDS prevention in women
  • Care and support at Federal, state and community level
  • Labor force
  • Sexuality education
  • Psycho social help and counseling support
  • Human rights and ethics
  • Research

In addition some cross cutting issues were studied e.g.

  • Management
  • IEC
  • Monitoring and evaluation
  • Partnerships
  • Funding
  • Multisectoriality
  • Community involvement
Needs: Safe Sexual Behavior
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Continued Denial of the existence of AIDS.
Education
  • Limited information in local languages
  • Limited information on STD/HIV/AIDS
  • Limited use of local channels of communications
  • Absence/limitation of sexual education in schools
  • General low enrolment of children at primary level and even higher in secondary and tertiary schools.
  • Girls attendance in school still low
  • Ignorance and illiteracy
  • Poor media interest and development
Culture
  • Negative cultural factors
  • Influence of religious factors
  • Youth cannot speak about sexual behavior with parents, teachers and they cannot publicly mention the subject
  • Myths and misconceptions and very strong beliefs of cures about STDs in general
  • Male sex behavior dominance
  • Sex freedom and acceptability of sexual behaviors such as multiplicity of partners, early sex, early marriages, child marriages, wife inheritance when widowed, etc.  Youngsters have sex early resulting in many teenage pregnancies.
  • Social sexual networking

Social behaviour

  • Indifference shown to STD/HIV/AIDS by population in general and youths in particular 
  • Lack of perception of risks especially among youths.  
  • Prostitution  
  • Poverty / affluence attraction to sex  
  • Social pressures  and peer examples  
  • Crime  
  • Lack of data on Homosexuality.  

Condom  

  • Lack of counseling and VCTs  
  • Non acceptance of condom  
  • No female condom  
  • Low availability of condom  
  • Poor quality of Condom  
  • Cost of condom.

 

Education

  • Curriculum for integrating STD/HIV/AIDS developed (1998) but not yet implemented   
  • Plan to bring sexuality education into schools. But not yet put in place   
  • Availability of communication channels at local levels   
  • Efforts to raise attendance especially of girls in primary schools.   
  • Media involvement   
  • National video counseling board ? multisectoral   
  • Advocacy targeted at government at all  levels.   
  • Sporting events   
  • Private T.V Stations  

Social behavior   

  • Poverty alleviation program   
  • Involvement of NGO?s CBO?s and Religious organizations.

Condom   

  • Social marketing of condoms  

Political Commitment

  • Political commitment at the highest level.
  

Needs: STD MANAGEMENT
Obstacles Opportunities
Early Detection
  • Not sufficiently integrated into PHC 
  • Lack of information about where to go for diagnosis Lack of information about 
  • STDs among population 
  • Fear of Stigmatization 
  • Lack of confidentiality at health services level Inadequate facilities at all levels of diagnosis 
  • Cost of investigation 
  • Non/poor availability of laboratory facilities for diagnosis 
  • Lack of relevant skills for laboratory detection 
  • Competition with alternative medical practitioners 
  • Insufficient number of Health workers 
  • Poorly distributed personnel Vulnerability of women 
  • Unavailability of data systems and poor management information system. 
  • Absence of information on private sector 
  • Lack of youth friendly services 
  • Paucity of relevant drugs 
  • Private sector may not follow norms and guidelines 
  • Difficulties in the application of syndromic guidelines 

Early Treatment

  • Cost of care Self medication 
  • Poor availability of drugs 
  • Competition with quacks 
  • Use of street/expired/fake drugs 
  • Non compliance with treatment and self medication Poor availability of treatment guidelines 
  • Poor distribution of available guidelines 
  • Lack of appropriate skills for treatment Inaccessibility to PHC facilities in some areas 
  • STD treatment assigned to special clinics Ineffective procurement of drugs 
  • No information on cost/practices of private sector 
  • Stigmatization 
  • Cultural beliefs 
  • Poor management of staff 
  • High turnover of trained staff 
  • Poverty (Staff and Clients) 

Epidemiology and Prevalence

  • Poor Management Information System on STD 
  • Institutional diagnosis and management systems of STIs are not available 
  • Information sharing between Public and Private sectors non-existent.

Counseling and information

  • Paucity of counseling service/personnel at all levels 
  • Poor utilization of condoms and counseling facilities 
  • Limited number of trained counselors at all levels 
  • Poor patronage of available facility 
  • Limited use of available counseling services due to stigmatization.
  • Routine syphilis test for ANC
  • Available, recently reviewed guidelines on Syndromic management
  • Ongoing strategic plan on STD/HIV/AIDS
  • Renewed strength for PHC
  • Renewed strength for NHMIS
  • Availability of NGOs, CBOs and religious organization
  • Media favourable to HIV/STD problems
  • Existing essential drug list
  • Cost recovery system through drug revolving fund. Helping to lower the cost
  • Existing curricula in training institutions.
  • Early manifestation in Men leading to search for help.
  • National Health Plan


Needs : Blood Safety
Obstacles Opportunities
  • National policy not yet implemented   
  • No legislation to back up policy   
  • No national blood transfusion services   
  • Uncoordinated services at state level   
  • Uncoordinated/ unsupervised private/ public laboratories   
  • No application of norms by blood bank   
  • Inadequate number of trained personnel   
  • Lack of supervision at all level   
  • No standard operating procedure   
  • Lack of information and education on risks to public 
  • Cultural and religious factors that impede blood donation.   
  • Lack of voluntary non remunerated blood donor system   
  • Non sustainable supply of consumables and reagents   
  • High cost of processing blood for transfusion   
  • Lack of blood substitute.   
  • Lack of blood components   
  • Lack of facilities to prepare blood components.   
  • No standardized pricing system   
  • Poor storage facility (Cold chain)   
  • Poor packaging   
  • Short expiry dates ? reagents   
  • Too many unnecessary transfusions prescribed (Anaemia - very common in women and children, Malaria, Sickle Cell)   
  • Poor political and financial commitment
  • Availability of private laboratory (When coordinated/supervised)
  • Known prevalence of HIV due to transfusion
  • Edict in Lagos state against blood transfusion not screened
  • Availability of private blood banks
  • Existing institution/curriculum for training
  • Interest of donor (DFID, WB, WHO, EU)
  • NGO ?blood for life? in Lagos
  • Availability of documents ? workshop carried out e.g. appropriate use of blood.
  • Year 2000 WHO day theme ? Safe Blood
  • Autotransfusion
  • Lagos and Oyo states have semblance of state level transfusion services.

 
Needs: Youth
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Inadequate and non implementation of policy on integration of STD/HIV/AIDS into school curriculum  
  • Many children and youth not in schools  
  • Inadequate sensitization of policy makers and implementors  
  • Inadequate funding of youths ? related 
  • STD/HIV/AIDS programs  
  • Negative attitude of parents to sex and sexuality issues  
  • Religious organizations attitude towards sexuality education  
  • Inequality of opportunity for education between boys and girls  
  • Poor role models of adults in society  
  • Early marriage for girls  
  • Poor perception of risks of STD/HIV/AIDS  
  • Negative peer pressure  
  • Influence of pornographic materials  
  • Non implementation of censorship policy (videos, films)  
  • Lack of youth friendly health care services ? counseling facilities  
  • Economic factors ? desire to get rich quick Increasing drop out rates in school  
  • Poverty Sexual harassment/abuse in school  
  • Hawking  
  • Increasing prevalence of street children and area boys  
  • Declining moral standards Increasing moral decadence  
  • Easy access of youth to alcohol, drugs, bars, nightclubs, etc.  
  • Decreasing parental supervision of youths  
  • Poor recreational facilities for youths  
  • Non implementation of laws and rights of children/youths  
  • Increasing unemployment  
  • Lack of social welfare package  
  • Increasing indiscipline in the society 
  • Misplaced priorities  
  • Paucity of channel of information targeted at youths  
  • Increasing IV and non-IV drug use among youths.
  • Sexuality education policy  
  • Poverty alleviation program 
  • Creation of jobs 
  • Availability of laws to protect children 
  • Introduction of UBE (Universal Basic Education)   
  • Existing institution
  • Availability of religious and traditional institutions   
  • Family life education in schools
  • Existence of youth clubs and associations
  • Availability of youth friendly club and societies.

 
Needs: Care and Support
Obstacles Opportunities
EARLY DIAGNOSIS
  • No facility for VCT 
  • Expensive cost of diagnoses Inadequate facility for diagnosis  
  • Poor health sector beheviour for prevention and diagnosis  
  • Paucity of reagents and consumables  
  • High cost of screening  
  • Poor quality control of testing  
  • Donor apathy in  care and support  
  • Care and support not linked to prevention  

COUNSELLING  

  • Inadequate facilities for pre/post test counseling  
  • Inadequate skills of health care providers  
  • Inadequate number of social workers.  
  • Paucity of trained counselor at all levels  
  • Poor selection of trainees  
  • Inadequate peer counselors  
  • Inadequate counseling by people living with HIV/AIDS  
  • Intimidating procedure of the counseling service  
  • Lack of hospital policy  
  • Lack of motivation for trained counselors Inadequate guidelines on counseling  

PATIENT MANAGEMENT  

  • Inadequate facilities at all level.
  • Inadequate trained personnel 
  • Inadequate supply of drugs  
  • High cost of care and support  
  • Stigmatization  
  • Confidentiality not observed and human rights.  
  • Poor referral system at all levels  
  • Lack of logistic for follow-up and continuum of care  
  • Limited funding for home care  
  • Ineffective monitoring and evaluation  
  • Competition with alternative medical practitioners and spiritual homes  
  • Poor reporting system  
  • Poor distribution of existing guidelines  
  • High turnover of trained counselors.  
  • High cost of care and support  
  • Inadequate mobilization of community to support people with HIV/AIDS  
  • Inadequate skills for social workers  
  • Poverty to sustain treatment and appointment.  
  • Increasing prevalence of TB  
  • Increasing number of AIDS orphans  
  • High cost of antiretroviral drugs (ARVD)  
  • Unavailability of ARVD  
  • Non -  control of sale and prescription of ARVD  
  • Lack of training in the usage of ARVD  
  • Lack of monitoring of medical and paramedical  
  • Lack of laboratory monitoring of those on ARVD  
  • Pressure from pharmaceutical companies to sell drugs.
  • Extended family system 
  • Existing training institution for care and support   
  • Existing community based organization, NGOs   
  • Existing manuals (Counseling, home care and case management)   
  • Media involvement.   
  • Political commitment and advocacy efforts   
  • Ongoing strategic planning   
  • The PHC structure (Multi-sect oral involvement)  
  •  Existing health facilities   
  • Association of PLWHA   
  • Interest of donor agencies, DFID, USAID, WHO, Pathfinder   
  • Existing  professional organizations   
  • Poverty alleviation program   
  • Pool of available trained counselors   
  • Increasing community awareness.   
  • TB/Leprosy program   
  • Report of the orphan survey.   
  • ARV on the essential drug list.


Needs: Women
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Social/Religious status of women
  • Poor access to information and treatment
  • Poor economic power
  • Cultural bias against women
  • Religious bias against women
  • No empowerment ? economically, socially, politically
  • No reproductive rights
  • Physiological factors
  • Early marriage
  • Inability to negotiate safe sex
  • Poor education
  • High level of illiteracy of women especially in the northern states
  • Violence ? rape abuse of women
  • Migration
  • Rural to urban areas
  • Poor legislation on women?s rights
  • Prostitution
  • No female condom
  • Religious/Social upheavals
  • Poor decision making power in sexual matters
  • Polygamy
  • Wife inheritance and wife sharing
  • Widowhood and inheritance rights
  • Non implementation of laws that apply to women
  • Poor/inadequate reproductive health issues
  • Poor distribution of NGOs especially to rural areas
  • Multiparity and large families
  • Lack of confidence in self and other women
  • Lack of channel of information
  • Women have little time for leisure and information
  • Women community organization
  • Women targeted programmes
  • Ministry of women affairs
  • Religious organizations 
  • NGOs, CBOs, Donors Agencies dealing with reproductive issues
  • More and more gender issues up-coming
  • Head of NACA, Minister of state of Health, Transport
  • Adult education Program
  • Female functional literacy program
  • Educated children
  • Plan to start Social marketing of female condom.


Needs: Labor
Obstacles Opportunities
INFORMAL SECTOR
  • More than 50% of labor force in the informal sector ? no social safety nets for illness and disability
  • Mobility of the informal sector
  • Poor organizational structure Inadequate provision for prevention of STD/HIV/AIDS among staff and workers
  • Poor reporting system
  • Migration of workers
  • Inadequate remuneration
  • Poor education
  • Poor health seeking behavior 

FORMAL SECTOR

  • Managers not sufficiently informed about STD/HIV/AIDS to help in prevention for their staff and workers
  • Little response from management
  • Lack of commitment of management towards STD/HIV/AIDS prevention and control
  • Inadequate welfare package for those with STD/HIV/AIDS
  • Little or no funds committed to STD/HIV/AIDS prevention and control
  • No reporting system to the central data on incidence and prevention rates   
  • Inadequate and sustained  information on STD/HIV/AIDS within the companies
  • Breach of confidentiality of HIV status
  • Mandatory pre-employment screening for HIV
  • Poor implementation of international, national laws on employment and labor
  • Breach of  human rights of HIV positive staff
  • Inadequate provision for care and support
  • Unions not utilized for prevention of HIV
  • Lack of policy on HIV/AIDS/STD in most organizations   
  • Frequent duty travel away from home which exposes them to risk
  • Disposable cash predisposes to leisure activities ? alcohol, multiple sexual partners, drugs, casual sex, etc.
  • Poor enforcement of occupational safety and health regulations.
  • Existence of Unions and Associations
  • Training department within organizations
  • Existence of health structures
  • Availability of funds
  • Organizational structure within the sectors
  • Potential to produce STD/HIV/AIDS education materials
  • Existing international and national laws, codes, ordinances
  • Existing social clubs within organizations  
  • Networking among organizations and companies


Needs: Sexual Education
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Sex not discussed openly in families and with adults
  • Sexual issues are taboos
  • Sex education not well addressed in school curricula
  • Sex education materials insufficiently produced
  • Sex education materials not widely distributed
  • Resistance of parents to introduction of sexuality education
  • Lack of skills of teachers/parents for sexual education
  • Resistance from religious leaders ? Islam/Christianity/Traditionalist
  • Low level of sexuality education among school children at all levels
  • Inappropriate peer education on sexuality

CONCEPTION OF EDUCATION (Production, distribution, Dissemination and evaluation)
CONCEPTION

  • Insufficient number of trained personnel at conception level
  • Insufficient material in local languages ?  funds for translation of materials in local languages
  • Insufficient trained IEC personnel at all levels  Insufficient training of staff
  • Lack of equipment, inadequate facilities for production of IEC materials
  • Inadequate  information sharing between different sectors
  • No supervision and regulation of quality and relevance of materials produced
  • Insufficient facilities to evaluate conception programs
  • Not all the sectors are covered in the conception
  • No supervision and regulation of quality and relevance of materials produced  

IEC PRODUCTION  
(Lack of Production Facilities)  

  • Inadequate funds for production of materials Inadequate quantity of materials produced due to lack of funds  

DISTRIBUTION

  • Difficulties with distribution of materials to states and LGAs due to inadequate funds, poor communication and networks
  • Poor logistics
  • Poor organization of distribution at all levels
  • No evaluation of distribution patterns at all levels  

DISSEMINATION  

  • Insufficient trained IEC personnel at all levels  
  • Inadequate funding  
  • Inadequate facilities for dissemination.  
  • Poor logistics at all levels  

EVALUATION

  • Irregular evaluation of materials and activities due to lack of funds
  • Inadequate personnel
  • Poor logistics
  • Poor communication network 

CONDOMS 

  • Religious opposition
  • Cultural opposition
  • Parental opposition
  • Unavailability of female condom
  • Poor decision making power of  women in reproductive health issues
  • Poor standard of condoms
  • Gross ignorance about use of condoms 
  • Inefficient social marketing
  • Perceived reduction of sexual pleasure 
  • Low acceptance of condom usage
  • Quality control assurance of condom is low 
  • No faith in condom
  • Condoms perceived as a method of family planning.
  • Cost of condom ? poor affordability 
  • Inaccessibility of condom in rural areas 
  • Lack of co-ordination and procurement of condoms
  • Tariffs on condoms
  • Inadequate information on condom utilization 
  • Absence of local production of condom.
  • Introduction of Sexuality education in schools
  • Existing information on HIV/AIDS/STI for IEC teams
  • Lack of production capacity within private sectors
  • Existence of marketing distribution networks
  • Existence of one condom quality assurance lab in Lagos.


Needs: Psychosocial Help and Counseling Support
Obstacles Opportunities
MEDICAL
  • Ignorance (Health Care and clients)       
  • Inadequate number of trained personnel       
  • Poor health seeking beheviour       
  • Inadequate and misdistribution of health facilities       
  • Inadequate protective devices for health workers       
  • Poor infection control      
  • Lack of infection control policies in various institutions       
  • Fear and stigma of healthcare workers       
  • No continuum of care       
  • Inadequate facilities for diagnosis of  opportunistic infections
  • Inadequate drugs for treatment of opportunistic infections       
  • Poor access to ARV drugs for opportunistic infections       
  • High cost of drugs       
  • No monitoring facilities for disease markers.  

PSYCHOSOCIAL HELP AND COUNSELLING SUPPORT   

  • Inadequate number of trained counselors at all levels   
  • Counselors not part of curriculum in training institution   
  • No organized training institution for HIV/AIDS/STD counseling
  • Inadequate number of guidelines for counseling   
  • No monitoring/evaluation of counseling that is going on.   
  • No networking between trained personals   
  • Inadequate psychosocial help   
  • Lack of sustainability (Inadequate funding for psychosocial support)   
  • Poor referral systems   
  • Poor logistics for follow up   
  • Stigmatization. 
  • Lack of confidentiality   
  • Poor continuing education facilities   
  • Competition with spiritual healers   
  • Competition with traditional healers   
  • Negative medical effects.  

SOCIAL  

  • Religious barriers  
  • Cultural practices  
  • Fear of the unknown Ignorance  
  • Poverty  
  • Access to information, diagnostic and treatment facility  
  • Gender inequality
PSYCHOSOCIAL HELP AND COUNSELLING SUPPORT   
  • Existing health facilities   
  • Existing NGOs, CBOs, religious organizations involvement   
  • Existing commitment   
  • Existing guidelines   
  • Existing association of PLWHAs  

MEDICAL   

  • Existing medical facilities   
  • Existing NGOs, CBOs etc   
  • Existing health facilities   
  • Existing NGOs, CBOs, religious organizations involvement   
  • Existing commitment   
  • Existing guidelines   
  • Existing association of PLWHAs   
  • Private medical practitioners   
  • Pharmaceutical companies

SOCIAL

  • Existing health facilities   
  • Existing NGOs, CBOs, religious organizations involvement   
  • Existing commitment   
  • Existing guidelines   
  • Existing association of PLWHAs   
  • Poverty alleviation program


Needs:   Human Rights and Ethics
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Legal department staff not sensitized enough on the importance of HIV/AIDS 
  • Conservatism
  • Laws are not following all new issues related to the HIV/AIDS epidemic and the profound changes that may have an impact on society as a whole
  • Non compliance with existing laws
  • Poor monitoring and implementation of existing laws
  • Gaps in existing laws on rights
  • Non enforcement of laws
  • Poor involvement of the legal profession on HIV/AIDS/STI issues
  • Poor circulation of documents
  • Populations are not sufficiently aware about existing laws on HIV/AIDS
  • Poor institutional backup at state and LGAs
  • Not enough political drive
  • Traditional/Religious laws do not address HIV/AIDS 
  • Strong Traditional/Religious laws which may be contrary to HIV/AIDS
  • Stigmatization
  • Ignorance
  • Prisons not protected enough
  • Existing laws
  • Existing human rights organizations
  • NGOs,CBOs, PLWHAs, professional Associations 
  • Existence of formal judicial systems
  • Existing international laws
  • Traditional Laws
  • Religious laws
  • Rights of the Child


Needs: Basic and Applied Research
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Both Basic and Applied Research
  • Poor documentation of social ? cultural research findings
  • Inadequate number of  trained personnel
  • Poor research into pharmaco-kinetics of medicinal agents
  • Poor funding of research
  • Inadequate number of institutions for research
  • Hoarding of information  Inadequate networking
  • Inadequate sharing of information
  • No national ethics committee
  • Poor co-ordination and evaluation of findings
  • Poor dissemination of results/poor feedback
  • Poor access to current information (Internet, E-mail, library etc)
  • Poor mobilization of resources (Human and material)
  • Very high competition
  • Poor co-ordination of finding at local and national level
  • Poor coordination with international research at regional level and international level
  • No feed back
  • Basic Research - Lack of central research directive / priorities 
  • Applied Research - No continuity of research   
  • No functioning regulatory body
  • Little exchange of information between private and public sector.
  • Existing research institutions, universities and teaching hospital
  • Availability of some data  
    NGO, donor, professional association, pharmaceutical company Conferences and meetings
  • Fellowship and scholarships
  • Existing department of planning, research and statistics.

Cross Cutting Issues

In addition to key areas some cross cutting issues have been analyzed,  these are:  

  • Management
  • IEC
  • Data collection
  • Education
  • Monitoring and evaluation
  • Partnership
  • Funding
  • Multisectoriality
  • Community involvement
Needs: Management
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Poor funding at all levels
  • Bureaucratic bottlenecks (Lack of Autonomy)
  • Weak coordination at all levels
  • Non implementation of multisectoral approach and qualities
  • Inadequate number and quality personnel
  • High turnover rate of personnel
  • No continuing education opportunities
  • Frequent change of leadership at both Program level and ministerial level
  • Very few officers at state/LGA levels dedicated to HIV/STD programs
  • Non functional state and LGA AIDS committees
  • Poor training of personnel in management issues
  • Poor coordination of NGOs Inability of program to recruit relevant technical staff
  • Weakness of financial mechanisms to allow States and local government to manage their own budgets
  • Weakness of financial management /funds take time to reach the decentralized level. 
  • Weakness in the  procurement system: no standardization of prices for consultations, prices of drugs, reagents
  • Weakness of management system at all levels
  • Weakness in human resources management
  • Organogram so far is within the health sector and does not respond to multisectoral approach
  • Personnel is unevenly distributed, with high concentration of essential staff in large towns at state capitals
  • NGO/CBO?s lack management capacities/procedures
  • Existing structure at all level
  • Evolving new structure 
  • Political commitment
  • Improved funding
  • NGOs/CBO?s   Management reforms at all levels


Needs: IEC
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Conception
  • Not enough planning
  • Duplication of efforts
  • Some areas are not sufficiently covered: youth, labour 
  • Not enough coordination among sectors (ministries ? NGOs ? international agencies)
  • Not enough sharing of experiences
  • Little networking
  • Production IEC is too often centrally produced ? not enough production at state level
  • Insufficient funding
  • Funding tends to be uncoordinated and mainly coming from donors
  • Funding comes for a one project at a time, insufficient programming -  Radio and TV programs are too often going on air without any guidance from the authorities in the field of STD/HIV/AIDS
  • Same thing for the print media
  • Information is not controlled
  • Insufficient IEC in local languages
  • Too much Media in the health fields, but not sufficiently in the other fields: education, youth, women, sports, culture, labor,  defense, prisons, etc. about HIV/AIDS
  • Not enough involvement of the PLWAs
  • IEC materials still respond to the needs of literate persons, but very little to illiterate populations
  • Communication is only one way with no feedback
  • Distribution
  • Not enough funding for distribution
  • Poor distribution mechanisms, the channels are always very limited
    IEC materials usually go to Health infrastructures
  • There is no mechanism to ensure that it gets to the beneficiaries
  • Materials often stored away without distribution
  • Many international agencies, and international NGOs distribute the materials which have been adapted to other countries, but not always adapted to Nigeria
  • Monitoring and evaluation
  • There is hardly any system for monitoring and evaluating the IEC programs; the only indicator is the number of materials published or programs done
  • Poor  feed back mechanism
  • Absence of measurement of the impact of IEC at field level no behavior changes
  • Not enough KAP studies in the area of IEC.
  • Excellent  private sector involved in publicity
  • Excellent media of good reputation
  • Well trained national personnel in IEC
  • Best practices available


Needs: Monitoring and Evaluation
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Monitoring is not yet regarded as a major needed activity often put on paper but not regarded as an exercise of its own
  • Weaknesses in programming monitoring
  • Weaknesses in monitoring activities 
  • Weaknesses in monitoring staff Insufficient training of staff in monitoring activities  
  • Weaknesses in monitoring time frames Inadequate funding for monitoring activities  
  • nadequate sharing of monitoring mechanisms  
  • Inadequate sharing of monitoring results  
  • Inadequate planning of monitoring indicators  
  • Monitoring is too centralized  
  • Monitoring is not enough done by parties at States and Local government levels
  • Communities and beneficiaries are not involved enough in monitoring  
  • Evaluation is not sufficiently programmed  
  • Not enough work done on indicators of output and outcomes
  • Often done by same teams who are in charge of implementation, hence lack of objectivity 
  • Inadequate funding for evaluation  
  • Evaluations seem solely to be an exercise done by donors, but not enough yet understood as an exercise to be systematically led by government and national stakeholders: Ministries, NGOS, CBOs
  • Evaluation in STD/HIV/AIDS activities often requires getting to know impact on social behavior ? little is known of where we are starting from and little is known about where what we really want to go
  • Evaluations are often too simplistic
  • Not enough financial evaluation built in programs and projects
  • Results of evaluations are not systematically shared, hence difficult to build in best practices.
  • The culture of building systematic monitoring and evaluation components in planning and programming are starting to appear
  • Ministry of Planning Ministry of Finance Department of human resources  
  • Donors requests


Needs: Data Collection
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Data mostly come from sentinel sero surveys for pregnant women  
  • Insufficient data for the other groups at risk: STD patients, Tuberculosis patients, prisons, pediatric patients, sex workers, transporters, etc.  
  • Poor health seeking behavior in general leading populations not to voluntarily be tested  
  • Paucity of data from other sectors except health  
  • Paucity of social behavioral surveys, population based surveys
  • Paucity of data on STDs 
  • Inadequate information sharing of results between sectors and intra sectors
  • Poor management information systems
  • Paucity of personnel with skills to manage data
  • Paucity of equipment for data management 
  • Poor utilization of data once collected  
  • Inefficient communication system  
  • Poor logistics for data collection.
  • A management information system recently in place at federal Ministry of Health  
  • Ongoing behavioral sentinel survey  
  • Ongoing capacity building done mostly by NGOs  
  • Recent renewed interest in the social fields around STD/HIV/AIDS  
  • Collection of bibliography recently done by Nigerian Institute of Medical Research  
  • Collection of best practices


Needs: Partnership
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Absence of a Strategic Plan to guide partnership: the country?s new response to the epidemic has not been spelled out Hence partnership has not been able to STD/HIV/AIDS has interested a limited amount of partners 
  • Lack of  political engagement until recently, leading to lack of advocacy and lobbying to encourage partnership  
  • Assistance from major donors was frozen during the large part of the period studied UN agencies have large amounts of priorities and HIV/AIDS is only one of them ? still difficulties to give a coordinated response  
  • The past political situation in Nigeria forced donors to find ways to go on with their assistance notably by directly giving support to NGOs,  without coordination.  
  • NGOs are numerous, but they are not organized in networks, apex does not exist, a large proportion of them are working in the Lagos State, while efforts have been made to identify them, not much has been done to evaluate their comparative advantages and the quality of their work.  
  • Few associations of PLWAs exist, PLWAs are still not yet seen as full fledged  partners.  
  • CBOs and congressional organizations exist and in most cases do very good work, but their roles as official partners  is not sufficiently considered.   
  • Mechanisms to finance CBOs and congressional organizations have not yet been established.  
  • NGOS are more likely to receive small grants than CBOs and congressional organizations.   
  • Congressional organizations tend to rely on donations which are not sufficient, not constant, and which are not always easy to obtain.   
  • Nigeria has not sufficiently benefited throughout the period of assistance of regional partnership.  
  • Nigeria is not sufficiently working in networking fashion with the neighbouring countries, the regional bodies, and the international community.  Research is the only exception to this. 
  • Donors are willing to support organized NGOs, but not necessarily community associations who lack status and accepted procedures.  
  • Communities organized or not organized have little power to get themselves known to the Government officials at whatever level, unless they reach the status of NGOs, and even then it is not always automatic.  
  • Communities have not sufficiently been considered as partners ? while a list of NGOs involved in the field of STD/HIV/AIDS exists, no list concerning CBOs exist.
  • Creation of UN AIDS theme group trying to find a common response amongst co sponsoring agencies  
  • Return of donors assistance to Nigeria (end of frozen assistance period).  
  • PLWAS beginning to organize themselves.  
  • Major donors are resuming their assistance to Nigeria  
  • NGOs and CBOs are starting to be given more importance and mechanisms to involve them more as partners are underway.


Needs: Funding
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Funding is directly aimed at the Ministry of health.  
  • Other sectors do not make provisions for funding in the field of AIDS, some present their requests to the Ministry of Health.  
  • NGOs receive funding directly from donors, without prior knowledge and consultation from MOH
  • States and Local governments are supposed to make their own budgetary provisions from their own fund raising mechanisms and they receive some funds from the Federal Government only to cover the World AIDS Campaign. 
  • Funding mechanisms are following the general laid down financial regulations observed by  the Government.  
  • Local governments and communities have been insufficiently involved in raising funds at their level to take part in activities at  field level.   
  • Ministries other than health have to request their budget  
  • No funding is planned  for maintenance and there is no depreciation policy over  the materials and equipment that are necessary in the frame of STD/HIV/AIDS policies. (research, laboratory, logistics, computers and other  materials for epidemiology)  
  • Delays in the release of funds from approved and voted budgets.  
  • Only a % of the budgets are really made available, while  the planing, programming, approval and vote of budgets were favorable to the entire budgets to be released.  
  • From 1993 till 1998, 605.355 US$ was allocated to AIDS through MOH.  Hence 101 000 US$ on average per year for a population of approximately 110 millions inhabitants.  
  • Out of this allocation only 428,113 US$ were spent (total real expenditure) hence 30 % of this allocated funds were unutilized during the same period.  
  • These funds only cover the national level requirements (IEC, Program monitoring, training, surveillance, ETC, etc.)  
  • Running costs (without salaries)  
  • Some years, for ex: 1994 and 1996, the funding was grossly insufficient less than 10 000 dollars.  
  • From 1993 onwards, the other sectors than health were supposed to provide a total of 736 000 US$  (Information, Education , Defense, Justice, Labor, Internal Affairs , Foreign affairs, Social Affairs, etc.  But these funds  never materialized even though the sectors were involved in  MTP.  
  • Donors froze their assistance during the major part of the period.  However, the overall STD/HIV/AIDS program, has been financed in larger proportion by donors than by Government.  
  • The situation analysis has been unable to provide information concerning the budget of the private sector in the field of STD/HIVAIDS alleviation (even though we know that it is inadequate) and equally there is no information about the donations to NGOs and CBOs.
  • PCA and NACA have the mandate for resource mobilization for the entire AIDS program  that will be  specified by the Strategic Plan  
  • NACA is reviewing the Organogram at national, State and Local Government levels and also the financial mechanisms that will become necessary to have a multisectorial STD/HIV/AIDS program in place.   This will no doubt require some reforms on financial mechanisms to allow more flexibility , rapidity and field level management.  
  • Cost recovery is introduced and is promising  
  • Once a year audits are conducted by the Ministry of Finance,  Office of Auditor General of the Federation.  
  • Political Commitment  
  • Renewed interest of donors  
  • Organized private sector and multinational organizations.


Needs: MultiSectoriality
Obstacles   Opportunities
  • NASCAP has tried to develop a multisectorial approach in the last part of its leadership.  
  • However this has not really been translated to multisectorial actions.  As of today the actions led at MOH remain more important than those done with other sectors.  
  • One important reason attached to this is that the STD/HIV/AIDS funding remains earmarked to MOH, and other sectors have been awaiting that MOH shares its budget or its personnel to plan and undertake actions.  
  • Several important sectors have not been sufficiently involved: education, women and youth, sport, prisons, private sector, finance,  while others are not involved at all:  agriculture, environment, Labor and production, Power and Steel.  
  • Other sectors have only mostly been considered through NGO work e.g.  transport.  
  • Even in non health sectors some trials have been done with success, not always taking into account the whole problem.  For example:  the defense ministry has developed a program for the men and women in uniform, but the police, the custom, and the prison wardens have not yet been included in schemes.  
  • Difficulties to coordinate multisectoriality at central level, and more especially at State and Local Government level  
  • In the mind of many actors, STD/HIV/AIDS is still a health problem In the mind of beneficiaries, STD/HIV/AIDS is still a health problem  
  • Media has  covered more of the Health aspect of the situation than the multisectorial approach  
  • Not enough publicity has been undertaken to explain that AIDS is not only a health problem, but it is also a societal problem that can have very hard social rooting, and  social political and economic causes and consequences which can only be solved through a multisectorial approach.  
  • Actors  at central, state and local governments are not sufficiently informed about the multisectorial approach.  
  • Funding mainly goes to the MOH. 
  • Recent creation of NACA, which is a truly multisectorial body, although not all sectors are yet represented: ex: agriculture and rural development.  NACA has the intention of bring all partners on board.
  • Political engagement to bring a real multisectorial response throughout the strategic Plan 
  • Good understanding of Ministry of Health to let other sectors come on board.


Needs: Community Involvement
Obstacles Opportunities
  • Communities have not received sufficient support to organize themselves and play specific roles: in education, advocacy for prevention, care and support  
  • Communities which are well organized for other matters have not received enough information on what kind of roles they could play at their own community level.  They lack information on STD/HIV/AIDS.  
  • Data and epidemiological data is seldom shared with communities, hence they have no idea about the prevalence and incidence rates in their communities ? hence communities are little concerned about the danger and do not organize themselves, except when they are led by NGOs.  
  • Donors are willing to support organized NGOs, but not necessarily community associations who lack status and accepted procedures.  
  • Communities organized or not organized have little power to get themselves known to the Government officials at whatever level, unless they reach the status of NGOs, and even then it is not always automatic.  
  • Communities have not sufficiently been considered as partners ? while a list of NGOs involved in the field of STD/HIV/AIDS exists, no list concerning CBOs exist.
  • NGOs and CBOs  
  • Congressional organizations of all faiths  
  • Local governments  
  • Successful trials made to involve communities in the care and support of PLWAS  

 

Bibliography of Major Sources

  • A Syndrome Based STD Surveillance System for Nigeria, Weir, M.J Ogundiran, A. Department of Genito-Urinary Medicine, Glasgow Royal infirmary, UK. STD Control Program, Oyo State Ministry of Health, Ibadan. Nigeria.  
  • Acceptance of People living with AIDS (PLWAs) at Work place Pat No Monye G. Iroka J.A Adegbite S. Agbogun C.E Adigwe P.K Omole. Life Continuity Foundation 31 Church Street Mushin Lagos Nigeria.  
  • Clinical Pattern of Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection (HIV) in pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Jos, Nigeria. Anteyi EA; Idoko JA; Ukoli CO; Bello CS. African Journal of Medical Sciences 1996 Dec. 25(4): 317-21 ? 1996  
  • Evaluation of Training on Syndromic management of STDs in Nigeria. Derex-Briggs, Ofosu-Barko K, Organization: National AIDS/STDs Control Program (NASCP), Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria; UNAIDS, Nigeria. Email: izeduwa@excite.com  
  • HIV Associated Disorders in Unsuspected Patients at a Nigerian University Teaching Hospital. Harry, D.N Bukbuk and A.E Moses, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, Nigeria  
  • Increasing Risk of Transfusion ? associated AIDS as the pandemic spread experience in Maiduguri, Nigeria Harry, T.O; Moses A.E; Ola T.O; Obi S.O and Bajani M.D. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1993; 96(2): 131-3  
  • New AIDS policy in Nigeria raises the stakes ? but optimism remains scarce Falobi O AIDS Analysis Africa. 1999 Feb-Mar, 9(5) 10-1. 1999  
  • Problems of Communicating HIV/AIDS Prevention and control in Nigeria: How has the Media coped? Omololu Falobi. Punch Newspapers,  1. Kuyeti street Onipetest Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria.  
  • Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD):- Six years experience in Jos University Teaching Hospital Bello CSS, Egah DZ, Okwori EE, Nwokedi EE, Katung PY, Zoakah AI, Opajobi SO, Ayeni JA, Barau C, Mafuyai S.    
  • Sickle Cell Anaemia and the Risk of HIV Infection in Lagos, Nigeria Ibironke Akinsete, Alani S. Akanmu, R. O. Olatunji, O.S Njoku, Dept. of Haemotology and Bld Trans. LUTH PMB 12003, Lagos; Dept of Haemotology, Luth, Lagos; Dept of Haemotology, GH, Lagos; Army Base Hospital, Yaba Lagos, Nigeria.   
  • Sickle Cell Anaemia and the risk of Transfusion Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency and Hepatitis B Viral Infections in Lagos, Nigeria Olatunji R.O Ajanmu A.S. Akinsete I, Njoku O.S 1998   
  • STD Treatment and Prevention among Nigerian Adolescents. Friday E. Okonofua, P.M Coplan, Mtemin, Women?s Health and Action Research Center 4 alofeje Street Benin City, Edo state, Nigeria; Merch and CO INC. West point, USA WHO Geneva, Switzerland.  
  • STDs and AIDS: a vicious circle of risks. AIDS watch. (1989), (7):2-4 Ogunseitan O; Mariasy J, - (Research/conferences)   
  • STD Aids Prevention Strategy; appeal to conscience and evangelization Pinneh T; Mba U; Udok E; Sam I; Emoefe M; Coker, D, - (Research)       
  • Sexual Practice that may Favour the transmission of HIV in a rural community in Nigeria. International quarterly of Community Health education. 1994; 14(4): 403 ? 16 Ajuwom AJ; Oladepo O; Adeniyi JD; Brieger WR ? (Research)   1999 
  • HIV/Syphilis Sentinel Sero-Prevalence Survey in Nigeria Technical Report. National AIDS/STD Control programme. Federal Ministry of Health.   Annex

Team Members

Members of Evaluation Teams States Visited
North East
Dr. A. Ogundiran (Team Leader)
Dr. H.S.Labo
Dr. A. A. Kalejaiye 
Major Abigail Omolola  
Mal Mohammed Sani Umar
Dr. M. F. Gboun  
Mal. Mohammed Gajo  
Mr. Cletus Wui
Bauchi  
Taraba  
Adamawa  
Borno
South-South  
Dr Tekena O. Harry (Team Leader)  
Abdul-Azeez Kolo
Suleiman Abullahi  
Ms. Maureen Onyia  
Festus Oyaide
Gabriel Ikwulono
Edo  
Delta  
Rivers  
Cross River
North-Central
Mrs. Omolara Euler-Ajayi (Team Leader)  
Dr. J. Nwabufo Ijezie (Secretary)  
Mrs. Charity Ibeawuchi (DFID)  
Mr. A. D. Abalaka  
Dr. O. A. Sotimehin  
Mrs. Shukuriya Salim Ali  
Mr. O.F Awopeju
Niger  
Kwara  
Kogi  
Nassarwa  
Benue  
Plateau  
FCT
North-West  
Dr. I. Dutse (Team Leader)  
Dr. I. J. Daudu  
Mr. A. Adepoju  
Mr. J. Olakanmi  
Mr. S. O. Agboola  
Mrs. A. Akinola (Secretary)
Sokoto
Zamfara
Kano
Kaduna
South-West  
Col. (Dr.) O. S. Njoku (Team Leader)  
Dr. Ibrahim A. Umar (Secretary)  
Dr. Ibrahim Lawal  
Dr. Ola Kunle Odumosu  
Dr. Joseph Nnorom (USAID)  
Mr. O. G. Akilapa  
Mr. Nathan Nzekwue
Lagos
Ogun
Osun
South-East  
Prof. G.C. Onyemelukwe (Team Leader)  
Dr.B.Kabari (Secretary)  
Group Capt. (Dr.) Yakassai  
Mr.Paul Okwulehie  
Mr. Adams Modu  
Mr.John Ibekwe  
Dr. O.O. Soretire
Abia
Imo
Enugu
Ebonyi
Anambra

List of Abbreviations

AIDS    Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
BI    Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
DFID    Department for International Development
FCT    Federal Capital Territory
FGM    Female Genital Mutilation
FGN    Federal Government of Nigeria
FMOH    Federal Ministry of Health
FOS    Federal Office of Statistics
GIS    Geographic Information System
HIV    Human Immunodeficiency Virus
HTP    Harmful Traditional Practices
KAP    Knowledge, Attitude and Practice
LGA    Local Government Areas
NACA    National Action Committee on AIDS
NASCP    National AIDS and STD Control Program
NGO    Non-Governmental Organization
NPC    National Planning Commission
NPHCDA    National Primary Health Care Development Agency
ODA    Overseas Development Assistance
PHC    Primary Health Care
PLWHA    People Living with HIV/AIDS
PTF    Petroleum (Special) Trust Fund
SITAN    Situation Analysis
UNAIDS    Joint United Nations Program for HIV/AIDS
UNICEF    United Nations Children’s Fund
USAID    United States Agency for International Development
UBE    Universal Basic Education
USD    U.S. Dollars
WHO    World Health Organization

 

space

  Copyright © 2005 Journalists Against AIDS (JAAIDS) Nigeria  |  http://www.nigeria-aids.org